![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:16 • Filed to: Fails | ![]() | ![]() |
Not only do you use the pre-facelifted versions of the Traverse, Enclave, and Acadia as examples, but you use the smaller Rogue to represent the Pathfinder and the larger body-on-frame pre-updated Expedition to represent the Explorer...
![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:20 |
|
strategy. Normal humans will not know the difference.
![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:20 |
|
Short of making them beige they did all they can to make them boring. Just like they were trying to do.
![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:21 |
|
this is how you business
![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:21 |
|
It was either an intern or some millenial who works in digital media and knows nothing about cars. I say this from the experience of being a millenial who works in automotive digital media and knows some stuff about cars. lol
![]() 05/06/2014 at 10:30 |
|
this.
I guarantee some low level chrysler intern or entry level digital media guy was told by his boss to go find an "explorer, highlander, pathfinder, traverse, acadia, and enclave" on a white background at a 3/4 Front Driver Angle (which he probably needed an explanation of what 3/4 Front Driver Angle is) and these were the first up in google image search.
![]() 05/06/2014 at 11:00 |
|
Every car company does this on they're "compare to competitor's model" thing.